SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48841

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
Dillibabu – Appellant
Versus
Vanipriya – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.Vijayasankar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Balaji

ORDER

Challenge has been made to the order of the Trial Court fixing the monthly maintenance at Rs.10,000/-, the present revision has been filed.

2. An application has been filed by the respondent/wife under Section

23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/-. According to her, her husband/petitioner is not maintaining herself and her autism child and he is earning Rs.40,000/- per month. Whereas, it is the contention of the husband that he is earning only Rs.12,000/- per month. Further, she has also filed MC.No.173 of 2023 on the file of the learned III Additional Family Court, Chennai. The Trial Court taking note of the facts that no maintenance has been ordered by any of the proceedings and also the autism child is in the custody of the wife has ordered interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/-.

Challenging the same, the present revision has been filed.

3. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

4. On perusal of the entire materials placed before this Court, this Court is of the view that the order of the trial court ordering interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- does not require interference for the simple reaso

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top