IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Amko Jemford – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Chandran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. misconceptions affecting compensation and financial distress justify review. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. review grounds include factual errors necessitating correction. (Para 2) |
| 3. court found sufficient grounds for review and adjusted fees. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 4. order set aside to remedy prior judgment errors. (Para 6) |
(Order of this Court was made by R.POORNIMA, J.
This review application has been filed as against the order passed in C.M.P(MD)No.7386 of 2025 in C.M.A(MD)SR.No.28055 of 2025 dated 30.04.2025, by the review applicant / petitioner/appellant on the following among other grounds :
(i) The observation of this court that the petitioner was granted compensation of Rs.22 lakhs has to be reviewed, as in the judgement dated 03.10.2020 rendered in the trial Court in MCOP.No.11 of 2021 in Paragraph No.19 inner Page 14 Type Set Page No.41 it has clearly stated that even though the compensation of Rs.22,88,802/- was fixed, a deduction of 70% on the petitioner towards contributive negligence and he is entitled to only 30% of compensation which comes to Rs.6,86,641/- only. So the observations of this Court that he was granted compensation of Rs.22,00,000/- has to be reviewed. The peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.