SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. Jayachandran, J
M.Mugilraja – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By Mrs. Logeshwari – Respondent
Cont.P.No.1003 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Arun Kumar
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Compliance with court orders is essential to avoid contempt charges.

Headnote:Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, a Contempt Petition was filed to punish the respondent for disobedience of a prior High Court order. The Government Advocate submitted compliance with the court's directive through an affidavit following the submission of the final investigation report. The petition was concluded, acknowledging compliance with the court's orders.

O R D E R

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent has filed an affidavit stating that, on completion of the investigation, the final report was filed on 12.07.2025 before the X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore and the same taken on file in C.C.No.1863 of 2025. 2. Recording the compliance of the direction, this Contempt Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top