IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Krishnamoorthi – Appellant
Versus
G.Sharmila – Respondent
O R D E R
The father in law and mother in law of the first respondent, who has filed proceedings before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Gobichettipalayam in D.V.A.No.2 of 2025, are the revision petitioners seeking to strike off the said Application in so far as the petitioners. 2. I have heard Mr.R.T.Vishnu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.G.M.Gokulram for M/s. Ram Gokul Advocates, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are not residing with their son and daughter in law, who have set up a separate residence and pointing out to the allegations that have been made against these petitioners, learned counsel would state that the allegations are either generic in nature or vague and not supported by specific instances with reference to dates.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would also state that only after the divorce proceedings were initiated by their son, the second respondent herein, the present domestic violence complaint came to be filed and he would contend that this is nothing but a counter-blast to the divorce proceedings initiated by the second respondent.
5. The learned counsel woul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.