Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA, J
K.Selvam – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for promotion consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disciplinary charges against petitioner outlined. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's defense against disciplinary charges. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. concerns over the disciplinary process and delays. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. legal precedents on disciplinary proceedings and delays. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. authority's failure to provide adequate reasoning in orders. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. government's stance on the irregularities committed. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. legal framework for disciplinary actions discussed. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. clarification on authority and jurisdiction in disciplinary matters. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 10. implications of procedural errors in disciplinary actions. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 11. delay in disciplinary proceedings affects promotions. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 12. court's observations on the disciplinary proceedings. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 13. inordinate delay in disciplinary proceedings highlighted. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 14. time limits for disciplinary proceedings established. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 15. court's decision to quash the impugned orders. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 16. final order for promotion consideration and directions. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
ORDER
2. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
