Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
V.Prabhaagher – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Cuddalore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner argues false statement regarding survey land. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution claims adequate materials exist for trial. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court finds typographical error does not warrant quashing. (Para 7) |
| 4. court dismisses petition suggesting trial continuation. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the final report filed in Spl.C.C.No.9 of 2024, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate cum Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Cuddalore.
2. Heard, Ms.Kanimozhi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel by taking this Court through the complaint that is contained along with the final report would submit that the survey number that is mentioned as 236 / 1B is a 'poramboke land' and therefore, the complainant is making a false statement. She would further submit that, with reference to the change of patta and other related matters, the relevant materials have not been produced. Her third contention is that no application was ever made to the Village Administrative Officer.
3. As a matter of fact, when the earlier application was made, the Village Administrative Officer has du
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
