Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Arjun Raj – Appellant
Versus
S.Deepa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order for expediting domestic violence complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners claim the complaint is vexatious. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondent asserts specific allegations of violence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court discusses requirements for maintaining complaints. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. court dismisses revision petition, upholding the necessity for trial. (Para 10 , 11) |
P.B.BALAJI, J.
After pronouncement of the order today i.e 18.07.2025 in the above Civil revision petition, Mr.K.N.Nataraaj, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the parties have already adduced evidence and the proceedings in the said Domestic violence complaint is pending at the stage of final arguments and thereby, he seeks for a direction to the Trial Court for expeditious disposal of the Domestic violence complaint in DVC.No.30 of 2023, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate – II, Tambaram.
2. In view of the above submission, read this order in continuation of and in conjunction with the order dated 18.07.2025 that reads as follows:
“The Judicial Magistrate – II, Tambaram is directed to dispose of DVC.No.30 of 2023 pending on its file within a period of eight(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
