Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR. SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Chinnamuthu – Appellant
Versus
Raji – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing ownership and prior settlement deed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention regarding the coercive nature of the deed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity and implications of the settlement deed. (Para 6 , 10 , 18) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the estoppel and validity of the cause. (Para 12 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2011 made in A.S. No. 43 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2010 in O.S. No. 76 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Palacode.
2. The Plaintiff, who instituted the suit in O.S. No. 76 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palacode is the Appellant in this Second Appeal. The suit was filed for the relief of declaration of title of the Plaintiff to the suit property and for a consequential permanent injunction restraining the Defendants 3 and 4 from in any manner changing the patta in the name of the Defendants 1 and 2 and for costs.
3. According to the Plaintiff, he is the owner of the property described in the plaint having purchased it by means of a sale deed dated 04.09.199
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
