SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar, JJ
Sarada Krishnan Sudhir – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition No.30605 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.Mohamed Hussen
For the Respondents: C.Kulanthaivel

Minimum qualifying service for Air Force pension is 15 years. Condonation of shortfall (up to 12 months) under Para 114 cannot be applied to those who have not completed 14 years of service, nor can it be combined with rounding-off rules to dilute the mandatory 15-year requirement.

Headnote:(A) Pension Regulations - Qualifying Service - Minimum requirement for service pension is 15 years under Regulation 121; condonation of shortfall up to 12 months under Para 114 is a discretionary concession applicable only if the airman has completed at least 14 years of service. (Para 7, 8)

(B) Interpretation of Regulations - Rounding off and Condonation - Combining the rounding off of fractions (3 months) with the condonation of shortfall (12 months) to meet the 15-year requirement for an airman with less than 14 years of service is impermissible and beyond the scope of the Pension Regulations. (Para 8, 12)

(C) Jurisdiction of Tribunal - Reading down of Regulations - A Tribunal cannot read down or dilute government regulations or directives unless their constitutional validity is specifically challenged as ultra vires. (Para 12)

Issues: Whether the petitioner, having completed 13 years and 360 days of service, is eligible for service pension by combining rounding-off benefits and condonation of shortfall.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding petitioner's qualifying service and tribunal's order for pension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. strict interpretation of regulation 121 and para 114 regarding minimum service. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. discretionary nature of condonation and limitations on tribunal's power to read down regulations. (Para 11 , 12)
4. dismissal of petition since benefits were already granted and union did not appeal. (Para 13 , 14)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of order of the Armed Forces Tribunal at Chennai in O.A.No.74 of 2019 dated 16.06.2022 and quash the portion of order “However, the arrears of pension is restricted for a period of Three years prior to the date of filing Original Application (OA filed on 18.03.2019)” and consequently, issue direction to the respondents to pay service pension to the petitioner with effect from the date of discharge of the petitioner i.e., 28.03.1999.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mohamed Hussen

For R1 to R5 : Mr.C.Kulanthaivel, Special Panel Counsel

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

Under assail is the order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chennai in O.A.No.74 of 2019.

2. The applicant before the Tribunal is the writ petitioner before this Court. The petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on 16.01.1985 and admittedly discharged from service on 20.03.1999. Thus, the petitioner rendered 13 years and 360 days of regular qualifying service (excluding 70 days due to AWL).

3. As per Regulation 121 of the Pension Regulations for The Air Force, 1961 (Part-1) the minimum qualifying regular service required to earn service pension is 15 years. As per the Government of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 14.08.2001, condonation of short fall in qualifying service for the grant of pension in respect of Airmen, beyond 6 months and up to 12 months may be condoned by the competent authority. Since the deficit service crossed more than one year, the said deficiency for qualifying regular service was not condoned, which resulted in the filing of Original Application before the Armed Forces Tribunal.

4. The Armed Forces Tribunal elaborately considered the issues and condoned the delay and allowed service pension to the writ petitioner. The order of the Armed Forces Tribunal directed the respondents to issue PPO to the petitioner granting service pension with effect from 30.03.1999. The arrears shall be paid within four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, failing which the arrears will carry interest at 8% per annum till payment. However, the arrears of pension is restricted for a period of three years prior to the date of filing of the Original Application in accordance with the principles laid down in the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Union of India and Others vs. Tarsem Singh , ((2008) 8 SCC 648).

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon the findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Surender Singh Parmar in Civil Appeal No.9389 of 2014 would submit that a fraction of a year equal to 3 months and above, but less than 6 months, shall be treated as a completed one half year and reckoned as qualifying service.

6. The main issue which crops up in the present lis is that an Airman not completed requisite qualifying services of 15 years under Regulation 121 of the the Pension Regulations for Air Force, 1961, but eligible to avail the benefit after condonation of short fall upto 12 months under Para 114 would be further eligible for condonation of short fall exceeding 12 months (i.e., 1 Year and 5 days) from the hands of the executive authorities.

7. Para 114 of the Pension Regulation is a concession extended to an airman for condoning the shortfall of qualifying service upto 12 months by the competent authority. For example, an airman completed 14 years and abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top