Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ
Shri Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Veesons Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction is established. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the purchase order and obligations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. issues framed by the trial court. (Para 6) |
| 4. arbitration clause impacts suit maintainability. (Para 9) |
| 5. evidence presented by both parties. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. trial court's findings on merits of the case. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. defendants' delay in invoking arbitration. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. court's discretion on arbitration clause. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 9. no merit in the appeal. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 10. appeal dismissed. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by
P.VELMURUGAN, J.)
The respondent is the plaintiff who filed the suit in O.S.No.116 of 2009 before the Principal District Court, Thiruchirappali and the same was made over to the I Additional District Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappalli for disposal in accordance with law. The learned I Additional District Judge dealt with the matter and decreed the suit in favour of the respondent and directed the first defendant therein to pay a sum of Rs. 57,28,702/- with subsequent interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the plaint till the date of realization. Aggrieved over the same, the defendants h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
