Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J
N.Govindaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims land release based on non-acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counsel references multiple precedents on similar land release cases. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court affirms earlier rulings regarding automatic reservation lapse. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. ratio confirmed: non-acquisition validates petitioner's land release. (Para 9) |
| 5. writ petition allowed with directions to release land. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction to the respondents to declare that the petitioner's land comprised in Survey Nos.230/2, 231/1, 231/2 Coimbatore is deemed to be released from the reservation of petitioner land for formation of public road as per the provision of Section 38 of Town and Country Planning Act and consequently direct the respondents to pass an appropriate order or release of the petitioner's land comprised in Survey Nos.230/2, 231/1. 231/2 in Ramanathapuram Village, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the the absolute owner of the property comprised in Survey Nos.230/3, 231/1, 231/2 at Ramanathapuram Village, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore to the total extent of 2.21 acres. The lands ar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
