Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA, J
Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
State through The Inspector of Police, Ganesh Nagar Police Station, Madurai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against acquittal based on incident allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding witness credibility and trial judge's perspective. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of evidence lacked corroboration and independent witness accounts. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final decision to dismiss appeal and confirm acquittal. (Para 12) |
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Crl.A(MD)No.74 2017 Thangaraj .. Appellant/Sole Accused Vs.
2014 dated 29.09.2015 and set aside the same.
2. Facts of the case are as follows:
ii. The second accused pushed the complainant to the floor and the sister of the complainant arrived to the spot and tried to prevent the accused from attacking the complainant. The accused joined together and beaten her also with hands and pushed her into trench and thereafter, ran away from the place of occurrence.
iv. After furnishing copies of records to the accused under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the substance of the charges under Sections 323 and 506(ii) IPC was explained to the accused. As the accused denied the offences and claimed to be tried, the trial was conducted.
vi. When the accused were questioned with regard to the ci
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
