Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
Abu Backer Sidhiq – Appellant
Versus
Tmt.M.Durdana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the eviction claim and basis for appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's ratio for allowing time to vacate. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 3. arguments and time requests made by the tenant. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. observations on compliance with the act and court directives. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final dismissal of the civil revision petition. (Para 16) |
ORDER
Challenging the reversal of the findings by the Rent Tribunal and the consequential order of eviction, the tenant(s) filed the present revision before this Court.
2. On 20.01.2018, the respondent leased out a shop premises measuring
360 square feet to the 1st revision petitioner for a twenty-two (22) months, commencing from 20.01.2018 and ending on 19.11.2019. The agreed monthly rent was Rs.20,000/- and a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid as advance. The tenant committed wilful default in the payment of rent. After adjusting the legitimate payments made, the respondent/landlord claimed rent arrears to the tune of Rs.8,44,666/-. The default is alleged to be wilful, deliberate, and indicative of a negligent attitude. A legal notice dated 02.02.2022 was issued terminating the tenancy. However, despite such termination, tenant(s) contin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
