Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.Justice N. Sathish Kumar, J
R.Syed Sadiq – Appellant
Versus
Tmt.M.Durdana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's obligations and grounds for eviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court hearings and legal representation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's consideration of prior cases and principles. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. affidavit and tenant's request for additional time. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling on eviction and timeline for compliance. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Challenging the reversal of the findings by the Rent Tribunal and the consequential order of eviction, the tenant has filed the present revision before this Court.
2. On 01.02.2016, the 1st respondent leased out a shop premises measuring 90 square feet to the revision petitioner for a period of ten years from 01.02.2016 onwards. The agreed monthly rent was Rs.7,000/- for the first five years, and Rs.8,000/- for the remaining five years. The revision petitioner committed wilful default in the payment of rent and unlawfully sublet the premises to the 2nd respondent. After adjusting the legitimate payments made, the respondent claimed rent arrears to the tune of Rs.1,61,500/- for the period from September 2020 to April 2022. The default is alleged to be wilful, deliberate, and indicative of a negligent attitude. A legal notice dated 19.04.202
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
