IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
S.RAMAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
M.RAMADAS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The un-successful plaintiff has preferred the above appeal. The Second Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 27.11.2017 passed in A.S.No.35 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 28.02.2013 passed in O.S.No.441 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.
2.For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the litigative status before the trial Court.
Case of the plaintiff:
3.According to the plaintiff, he had purchased the suit schedule property through a registered sale deed, dated 30.08.2001 in Ex-A1 from one Thangaraja son of Kandhasamy represented by his power holder, Antony. Pursuant to his purchase, revenue records were mutated in his name and he is in possession and enjoyment of the suit property. It is the further case of the plaintiff that the defendant, who is having no right over the suit property and who is having property adjacent to the suit schedule property of the plaintiff, had attempted several times to encroach into the suit property. The suit property is surrounded by well bounded boundaries in which, the plaintiff


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.