Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr.G.Jayachandran, J
Mr.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Mrs.Gokilam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case involves a partition suit regarding intestate succession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concern the validity of oral partition claims and legal evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court discussions emphasize adherence to statutory inheritance rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion confirms the trial court's decree and dismisses the appeal. (Para 11 , 12) |
J U D G M E N T
The suit filed for partition by one of the daughter of Kamalammal. Two of the defendants who are daughter of Kamalammal conceded for division, but was resisted by the third defendant, who is the son.
2. The trial Court, after considering the pleadings and evidence, allowed the suit for partition and passed a preliminary decree, declaring that the three daughters and one son of Kamalammal, who died intestate are entitled to suit schedule property left behind by her.
3. The present appeal is filed by the son, being aggrieved by the preliminary decree of declaring the plaintiff entitled for 1/4th share in the suit property and the permanent injunction as against the defendants from alienating the property.
4. The Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the trial Court failed to con
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
