Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
D.Thamodharan – Appellant
Versus
The State rep.by The Station House Officer, Chengalpettu P.E.Wing Police Station, Chengalpattu District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property return petition dismissed due to ongoing confiscation. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court reviews arguments from both sides regarding property return. (Para 2) |
| 3. court finds no reason to interfere with trial court’s decision. (Para 5) |
ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
28.12.2024, the petitioner had transported the following liquor bottles from pondy:-
(ii) Corona Extra Beer, each 330 ml – 144 Nos.
(iv) Hoegaarden Beer, each 330 ml – 144 Nos.
(vi) London Dry Gin – 12 Nos.
4(1)(A), read with Section 4(1)(aaa) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. Pursuant to the registration of FIR, the car and the liquors were seized and deposited before the Magistrate Court. Therefore, the petitioner, being the owner of the car filed an application seeking return of property. However, it was dismissed by the Trial Court on the ground that the confiscation proceedings in respect of the said property had already been initiated by the respondent.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision case stands dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
