Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. BALAJI, J
Bakkiam – Appellant
Versus
Poovayammal (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admissibility of unregistered partition documents in court. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of marking evidence for collateral purposes. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarification on grounds for allowing evidence in property disputes. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling on the matter. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner preferred this Civil Revision Petition challenging the order in I.A. No.14 of 2025 in O.S.
No.265 of 2013 before the I Additional Sub Judge, Salem.
2. Heard Ms.D.Jeevitha, learned counsel for Mr.R.Nalliyaappan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. An Application was taken out under Section 60 of the Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 , to mark the Photostat copy of the partition deed dated 30.01.1989, which is admittedly, unregistered and also insufficiently stamped. The Trial Court finding that the document required registration and on this ground, dismissed the said Application.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.Jeevitha would submit that the Trial Court has committed an error in rejecting the Application. She would rely on the settlement deeds dated 30.06.2010 and 24.10.2011. In fact, the settlement deed dated 30.06.2010 ha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
