Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Ravi Kapoor @ R.J.Ravindranath – Appellant
Versus
Janaki – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final decision allowing eviction based on proving rent payments. (Para 1 , 5 , 16) |
| 2. argument regarding tenant's relationship and evidence of rent payment. (Para 4 , 10 , 14) |
| 3. jurisdiction and definitions in landlord-tenant relationship under the act. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Challenging the order of the Appellate Authority, reversing the order of the Rent Controller, the present revision has been filed.
2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Rent Court.
3. The applicant/landlord has filed an application under Section
21(2)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act 2017 (hereinafter referred as the “Act”) for eviction of the tenant on the ground that the written rental agreement has not been registered within 575 days.
4. The stand of the respondent/tenant is that though the applicant used to collect the rents, and the rents have been paid regularly by the respondent, there was no landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. One R.K.Manulal has filed a similar petition for eviction against the father of the respondent in RCOP No.2322 of 1976, and the same was dismissed on 28.04.1978. Accord
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
