SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
St.Francis Nursery School – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.No.8580 of 2021 | WMP.No.9138 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.A.Arul Mary
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Murali, Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik

Withdrawal of writ petition is permissible when the petitioner fulfills the demand subject to the petition.

Headnote:In the present case, the petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution requesting the waiver of arrears of contributions under section 91C of the ESI Act, 1948. The petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition after stating that the demanded amount was paid, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn without costs. The court noted this instruction and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of writ petition leads to dismissal. (Para 1)
2. no costs applied to withdrawn petitions. (Para 2)

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and she has made the following endorsement in the case bundle :

"The petitioner instructed to withdraw the petition as it was paid the entire amount of demand."

2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top