Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
M.Pandiselvi – Appellant
Versus
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of magistrate regarding re-investigation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on procedural compliance and limitations (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence and relevance (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.
3442 of 2022, dated 03.02.2023, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram, dismissing the petition filed under Sections 190(1)
(b) r/w 173(8) and 156(3) Cr.P.C.
2. On the basis of the complaint lodged by one Narmadha, wife of M.Ganagapandi, F.I.R., came to be registered in Cr.No.12 of 2020 on 03.03.2020 under Section 174 Cr.P.C., on the file of the Railway Police Station, Rameshwaram. The respondent police, after completing the investigation, by holding that the complainant's husband's death is an accidental death, filed a final report as further action dropped. The petitioner – mother of the deceased Ganagapandi has filed the above petition under Section 190(1)(b) r/w 173(8) and 156(3) Cr.P.c., seeking re-investigation in the case registered in Cr.No.12 of 2020 alleging that his son was murdered by some persons, but the final report came to be filed as accidental
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
