IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
K.Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), Chennai – Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor Project, Kumbakonam. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and petition details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claimants' reference to court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. reference court's compensation ruling. (Para 6) |
| 4. points for consideration. (Para 7 , 8) |
COMMON ORDER
The revision petitions in C.R.P. Nos. 4009 and 4010 of 2022 have been filed by the claimants challenging the common order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the learned Principal District Judge (Reference Court), Nagapattinam, in L.A.O.P. Nos. 20 and 16 of 2021 respectively, on the ground of inadequacy of compensation awarded for the lands acquired. On the other hand, the revision petitions in C.R.P. Nos. 3030 and 3033 of 2023 have been preferred by the State/Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), Chennai– Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor Project, Kumbakonam, aggrieved by the enhancement of compensation made by the Reference Court from Rs.41.40 per square meter, as originally awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, to Rs.61.80 per square meter. The lands in question were acquired under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 for the purpose of formation of the Chennai–Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor Project.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.