Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Manimaran, C.Mathiyazhagan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its, The District Collector, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against resolution for service termination based on government orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. accusations of malafide influencing service discontinuation. (Para 4) |
| 3. court finds actions by the panchayat complied with lawful directives. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the Resolution dated
31.07.2012 passed by the fourth respondent resolving to discontinue the services of the petitioners.
2. Initially, the petitioners 1 and 2 herein were appointed temporarily as a Water Tank Operator and health worker (Sweeper) on 01.12.2000 and 01.10.2001 respectively in the third respondent panchayat and they have been worked as such till the year 2012. While so, in the year 2012, by virtue of the impugned Resolution, the services of the petitioners were dis-continued. It was aggrieved by the said Resolution, the petitioners approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition in the year 2014. At the time of filing the Writ Petition, the petitioners were aged about 43 and 46 years respectively. As of now, the petitioners are aged about 54 and 57 years.
3. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the appointment o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
