IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, G.ARUL MURUGAN, JJ
P.Pison – Appellant
Versus
The Director / Assistant Director (FAC), District Town and Country Planning Office, Kanyakumari District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notice under planning act. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's observations on unauthorized constructions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
The notice issued under Section 56 (1) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act , 1971 in Notice No.314/2025/KKDTCP dated
19.03.2025, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition.
2. No Writ against the notice is maintainable unless such notice has been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with the allegations of malafides. Notice for locking and sealing is a step taken by the authorities after conducting a field inspection and after ascertaining the fact that the building is unauthorised one. If at all the petitioner has any ground, he has to prefer a revision before the Government under Section 80A of the Town and Country Planning Act. Therefore, the Writ Court cannot adjudicate disputed facts of this nature.
3. Unauthorised constructions are posing danger to public at large. Such constructions are not only causing environmental damage, but also a threat to the road users and neighbours. Therefore, there cannot be any misplaced sympathy against the unau
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.