Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR, DR.ANITA SUMANTH, JJ
Shankar – Appellant
Versus
The Director Directorate of Town & Country Planning – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal process initiated (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. property ownership dispute through power of attorney (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial authority invalidated provisions of the registration act (Para 5) |
| 4. representation for annulment without legal standing (Para 6) |
For Appellant : Mr.G.Munuraj JUDGMENT (made by N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.)
Challenging the order of the learned single Judge dated 20.11.2024 passed in W.P. No.33694 of 2024, the present writ appeal has been filed by the appellant herein/writ petitioner.
2. Since no adverse order is going to be passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is not necessary and this writ appeal is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself, after hearing the appellant/writ petitioner.
3. According to the appellant/writ petitioner, his father, who was arrayed as the seventh respondent in the writ petition/7th respondent in the writ appeal, had purchased a property from the income derived from the ancestral property. The seventh respondent, namely K.Srinivasan, was forced to execute a Power of Attorney dated 24.03.1986 in favour of one R.Govindasamy. The said Govindasamy sold the property vide sale deed dated 13.11.1986 registered
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
