Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
A.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for mandamus on temple grievance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. management actions directed by court. (Para 4) |
| 3. order for immediate action by commissioner. (Para 5) |
Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 11 to address and redress the grievance of the 12th respondent temple by considering the petitioner's representations dated 08.07.2013 and 26.05.2025.
For Petitioner : No appearance - Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, Party-in-Person For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthikeyan Government Advocate [R1, R9 to R12]
Mr.T.M.Rajangam, Government Advocate [R2 to R6]
Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate [Crl.side] [R7]
Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Special Government Pleader [R8]
*****
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 11 to redress the grievance of the twelfth respondent temple by considering the petitioner's representations dated 08.07.2013 and 26.05.2025.
2. When the writ petition came up for hearing on 10.06.2025, this Court directed the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Hindu Religious
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
