Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. SUNDAR, HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, JJ
K.Thilagaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Madurantakam Municipality, Chengalpattu District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order on encroachment removal (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on property classification and authority (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal interpretations of encroachment and jurisdiction (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final ruling on petition dismissal (Para 16) |
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
The petitioner challenges the order dated 03.04.2025, whereby he has been directed to remove the encroachment in T.S. No. 37, Block No. 40, Ward A, situated within the limits of Madurantakam Municipality. As per the Town Survey Land Register (TSLR), the said property corresponds to old Survey Nos. 1008/1A (part) and 1007 (part) (hereinafter referred to as “the property” for the sake of brevity).
2. The petitioner claims that his deceased father was in possession and enjoyment of the said property, and after his demise, the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment thereof. He further states that he is an advocate by profession. According to the petitioner, the said property is classified as ‘Grama Natham’ in the revenue records. The respondent Municipality had issued an order dated 10.10.2024 directing the removal of the alleged encroachment on the said proper
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
