Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN, J
J.Syed Maohammed – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Crescent Housing (P) Ltd., Rep.by its Director K.Sivaraman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the parties involved in the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendants contest the plaintiffs' right to injunction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. trial court framed issues regarding entitlement to injunction. (Para 6) |
| 4. injunction requires rigorous legal standing by co-owners. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's analysis of rightful possession and necessity of due process. (Para 12 , 14) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.06.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN A.S.No.102 of 2022
1.J.Syed Maohammed
2.J.Shahul Hammam
3.Miakkan
4.J.Mohideen .. Appellant/Defendants 3 to 6 Vs.
1.M/s.Crescent Housing (P) Ltd., Rep.by its Director K.Sivaraman, 89, Santhome High Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai-28.
2.Sarath Kakumanu M.Jamaludeen (died)
3.Pakir Meeral
4.Pichammal Begam 5.Mohammed Begam
6.Jamaludeen
7.Alija
8.P.Ammenal Beevi
9.J.Mohammed Riyaz .. Respondents/Defendants 7,9 to 13 & 22 [Cause title accepted vide Court order dated 14.02.2022 made in C.M.P.No.521 of 2022 in A.S.SR.No.117612 of 2021 (CVKJ)]
PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI of C.P.C, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2019 made in O.S.No.12594 of 2010 by the learned XVIII Addi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
