Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA, J
Muthukaruppan @ Karuppuraja – Appellant
Versus
State at Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on consistent witness testimonies. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding fir delay and witness support. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court findings on evidence corroboration. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. corroborative evidence supports the prosecution. (Para 10) |
| 5. court's reasoning for upholding conviction despite defenses. (Para 13) |
| 6. court modified punishment based on offender status. (Para 15) |
| 7. modification of punishment and compensation to victim. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant / sole accused, challenging the order dated 02.05.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, made in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2019.
2. The appellant is the sole accused who has been convicted for the offences under Section 4 of TNPHW Act read with Section 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Ordinance Act, 2015, Section 323 of IPC and under Section 324 of read with Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA)
Amendment Ordinance Act 2015.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 14.01.2019, the accused went to the house of P.W.1 and pulled the hands of P.W.2, who is the wife of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
