IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
M.Selvin – Appellant
Versus
L.Paranjothi – Respondent
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.513 and 514 of 2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to interlocutory orders in partition suits. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner seeks deferral of orders based on pending appeal. (Para 3) |
| 3. court defers orders until appeal resolution. (Para 4) |
| 4. final decision affirmed with no costs. (Para 5) |
COMMON ORDER
These Civil Revision Petitions are filed challenging the orders dated
02.08.2019 and 17.06.2019 in I.A.No.73 and 14 of 2019 in I.A.No.170 of 2017 and 9 of 2018, respectively on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Palani.
2.The petitioner in both the petitions is the first defendant in O.S.No.86 of 2012 and the third defendant in O.S.No.116 of 2012. Both the suits were filed for partition and the said suits were decreed. Thereafter, the petitioner/sisters filed an interlocutory application in I.A.No.9 of 2018 and I.A.No.170 of 2017 for passing final decree. In the final decree proceedings, the plaintiffs filed applications in I.A.No.14 of 2019 and 73 of 2019 for inclusion of some other properties in both the suits on the ground that the mother of the plaintiffs in both the suits died and the share of the mother was allotted to the female heirs. The said applications were allowed. Challenging the same, the present Civil Revision Petitions are filed.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner in both petitions submits that all the properties were added in the preliminary decree. Allotment of additional shares to the plaintiffs on the ground that the mother settled her shares in favour of the plaintiffs, has to be decided in the final decree proceedings. Now as against the preliminary decree, the aggrieved persons filed A.S.(MD)Nos.150 to 152 before this Court and the said appeal are pending before this Court with an interim order of stay for passing final decree alone. Hence, it would be suffice to defer the order in I.A.No.73 and
14 of 2019 till the disposal of the appeal.
4.The learned counsel for the respondents in both the petitions have no serious objection for the same.
5.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of holding that the order passed in the interlocutory applications, which are impugned in these petitions shall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the first appeal pending before this Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.