Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Kumarappan, J
N.Karthik – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to the Government, Higher Education (B1) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600009. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging equivalence determination based on educational qualifications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the consideration of equivalency criteria. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court’s deference to expert analysis in qualification equivalency. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. reiterating judicial boundaries in the context of qualification equivalence. (Para 7) |
| 5. dismissal of the writ petition upholding the equivalency determination. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
The instant writ petition has been filed challenging G.O.(Ms) No.112, Higher Education (B1) Department, dated 22.06.2022.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by virtue of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.28251 of 2018 dated 29.11.2021, he has submitted all the materials to obtain an equivalence certificate for the Computer Course taught as part of M.A. Tourism, however, the Equivalence Committee, without considering the material aspects, has reneged the equivalence certificate, on the premise that, the Certificate Course in Computer on Office Automation awarded by the Directorate of Technical Education is superior. It is the specific submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relevant materials have
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
