Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Kumarappan, J
M.Baraniraj – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for certificate verification exclusion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. burden of proof on candidate for qualification equivalence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's prima facie view on qualification equivalence. (Para 7) |
| 4. public employment must retain qualified candidates. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. direction to ascertain qualification equivalence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER
The instant writ petition has been filed on the ground that, despite being allowed to participate in the Combined Technical Service Examination and securing 267.00 marks, with third rank overall, the petitioner was not permitted to participate in the physical certificate verification counselling, without assigning any reason.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the respondents dispute the petitioner's qualification namely a Master of Business Administration (MBA) in Marketing and Human Resources Management as not being equivalent to an MBA in Marketing, it is pertinent to note that the respondents had initially permitted the petitioner to apply for the post via an email dated 23.08.2024, stating that he was eligible. It is only through a counter statement that they claim the petitioner's d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
