IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
G.Padmavathy – Appellant
Versus
Senthamaraikannan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for partition and examination of notary corroborative. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. court's procedural adherence without requiring respondent notification. (Para 4) |
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan * * * * * ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking orders to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 02.12.2024 made in I.A.No.5 of 2024 in O.S.No.
320 of 2016 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Court, Srivilliputtur. 2. The petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.320 of 2016 seeking declaration and for partition and other reliefs. The petitioner is the daughter of the fourth respondent / the second wife of the deceased father. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are the children of the first wife. The grievance of the petitioner is that the entire property was taken over and alienated by respondent Nos.1 to 3 in favour of third parties without effecting a proper partition. After completion of the plaintiff’s side evidence, respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed an interlocutory application in I.A.No.5 of 2024 under Order XVI Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC , seeking permission to examine a Notary Public. The said application was allowed by the trial Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.