Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Vijayakumar, J
Ramakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Chellamuthu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims regarding property ownership and distribution need to be resolved with proper documentation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants must rely on clear titles when claiming property. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. land demarcation must adjust for previously sold portions when establishing boundaries. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. clarity in the sale deeds affects rightful property claims. (Para 13) |
| 5. judicial affirmations on property ownership require proper adherence to documentation. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.392 of 1985 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai have filed the present second appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the Courts below.
2.According to the plaint averments, the plaintiffs' father namely Ponnan Nadar was allotted 65 cents out of 1 Acre and 30 cents in Old Survey No. 2747/1(Resurvey No.47/2) in partition under Exhibit A1 dated 11.04.1948. It is the further case of the plaintiffs that on the same day of partition, the father of the plaintiffs had executed a registered sale deed in favour of the first defendant under Exhibit A3, for an extent of 15 cents which is on the southern most portion of 65 cents. The first de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
