Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Chenniappan – Appellant
Versus
Nanjammal Chennimalai Gounder – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the maintainability of the suit. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. issues framed for determination. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments regarding property acquisition and partition. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. details on the nature of property ownership. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. plaintiff's admission regarding family relations. (Para 19) |
| 7. legal principles related to partition and ownership. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. arguments regarding limitation and ouster. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. judicial precedents related to partition and claims. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. response to arguments regarding property ownership. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. court's observations on the trial judge's decision. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 12. final observations and conclusions by the court. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 13. conclusion of the appeal. (Para 52) |
JUDGMENT
This Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 23.01.2023 made in O.S.No.386 of 2019 on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Coimbatore (O.S.No.797 of 2006 – II Additional Sub Court,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
