Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. Ramesh, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
Karpagam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to detention based on familial relation. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments against detention order focus on lack of dated evidence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court emphasized the necessity for dated statements in maintaining lawful detention. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. quashing of detention due to lack of proper reasoning. (Para 6) |
(Order of the Court was made by M.S. RAMESH, J.)
The petitioner herein, who is the aunt of the detenu namely Vignesh @
Ganja Karuppu Vicky, aged about 26 years, S/o.Karunakaran @ Appu, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 19.02.2025 issued against her nephew, branding him as "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. Though several grounds are raised in this petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner focused mainly on the ground
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
