IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.Pugalendhi, J
Senthurpandi – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, Eppodumvendran Police Station, Thoothukudi District. – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.115 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police registered for the offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS r/w. Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act , 2002. They have moved this petition seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.115 of 2025 registered against them, on the ground of compromise.
2. The 2nd respondent/defacto complainant, who is represented through a counsel, submits that he is not inclined to prosecute the case further.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the case in Crime No.115 of 2025 was registered only on 14.06.2025.
4. Since the case in Crime No.115 of 2025 has been registered as against the petitioners for the offence under Section 109(1) BNS (attempt to murder), this Court is not inclined to quash the FIR in Crime No.115 of 2025 based on the compromise memo. However, the grounds raised by the petitioners in this petition can be appreciated by the investigating officer during the investigation.
5. Therefore, the investigating officer is directed to consider all the points raised by the petitioners and find out the nature of offence. In the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.