Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
K. V. Venugopal – Appellant
Versus
The First Appellate Authority Joint Commissioner Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition allowed with directives for compliance. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. personal information exemption under rti act. (Para 3) |
| 3. service details must be disclosed; public interest outweighs personal privacy. (Para 4) |
For Petitioner(s): Mr.L. Dhamodharan For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the
3rd respondent dated 05.06.2025 and for a direction to the 2nd respondent to comply with the directives issued by the 1st respondent through communication dated 23.05.2024 and which was reiterated by the 2nd respondent through communication dated 29.05.2025 and to furnish the information as sought for by the petitioner in his application dated 27.03.2025.
2. Heard Mr.L.Damodharan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents
1 to 3.
3. The 3rd respondent has refused to give the information on the ground that it involves providing details of individual persons and therefore there is a bar under section 8(1) (j) and 8(1) (g) of the Right to Information Act.
4. The issue involved in the present wri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
