Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Velmurugan, J
P.Perumal – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police Namakkal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investigation records of crime no.104 are missing, necessitating action. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. petitions filed to address procedural violations and quash related cases. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court mandates adherence to procedural guidelines for investigations. (Para 4) |
| 4. disposal of petitions with directives for proper procedure. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The Crl.O.P.No.18241 of 2025 has been filed to withdraw the investigation in Crime No.104 of 2013 from the file of the 2nd respondent and to transfer the same to the 3rd respondent CBCID for fair and proper investigation in Crime No.104 of 2013.
2. Crl.O.P.No.18054 of 2025 has been filed to call for the records and quash the criminal case in PRC No.25/2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumarapalayam for violation of the guidelines given in para No. 58 and 59 of the Hon'ble Full Bench Judgment in T.Balaji Vs State (2024 (5) CTC1 (FB).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent-Police and perused the materials available on record.
4. On a perusal of the records it is seen that there are two Crime Nos.104 and 105 of 2013, which are case a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
