SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. Arul Murugan, J
Janaki – Appellant
Versus
Krishnamani – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/Petitioner: Mr.S.Sureshkumar
For the Respondents:

JUDGMENT

The unsuccessful plaintiff is before this court on appeal.

2. The second appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2024 in A.S.No.13 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil, confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2021 in O.S.No.187 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their litigative status before the trial Court.

4. This second appeal is heard and disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

5. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property originally belonged to the mother of the plaintiff's husband. After the death of the plaintiff's mother-in-law and the death of the plaintiff's husband, the plaintiff inherited the suit property. It is the further case of the plaintiff that the defendant, who was houseless and who wanted to construct a house, sought permission to temporarily reside in the suit property. The plaintiff had accepted the same and gave the suit property to the defendant on tenancy, fixing the monthly rent at Rs. 750/-. The tenancy commenced on 01.01.1997. It is the further case of the plaintiff that e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top