Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60384
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. MALA, J
S.Sumermull Baid – Appellant
Versus
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority – Respondent
WP No. 4344 of 2010
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s. G. Vivekanand, T.S. Thevaraj, Vakuni Mohan, Lavanya
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Rajendiran, M/s P.R.Raman, M/s S.Sundaresan
Settlement between parties can resolve disputes involving writ petitions challenging administrative actions.
Headnote:The judgment addresses a Writ Petition filed under Article 226, seeking to challenge a planning permission granted by the authorities. The matter settled amicably through a Memorandum of Compromise formalized on 12.08.2020. The Court acknowledges the settlement, resulting in dismissal without costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review of administrative decisions under article 226. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties resolved their dispute amicably through compromise. (Para 2) |
| 3. court finalizes case based on the compromise. (Para 3) |
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorai to call for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings in Letter No.C3/10819/08, dated 17.12.2009 and the planning permission granted by the first respondent to the respondents 2 to 11 in file No.C3/18050/2005, dated 17.11.2006 and quash the same.
For Petitioner(s): M/s. G. Vivekanand, T.S.
Thevaraj, Vakuni Mohan, Lavanya Dt 14/07/2023 For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Rajendiran AGP for R1 M/s P.R.Raman for R3 To R11 M/s S.Sundaresan for R2
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking quashment of Letter No.C3/10819/08, dated 17.12.2009 passed by the first respondent and the planning permission granted by the first respondent to the respondents 2 to 11 vide file No.C3/18050/2005, dated 17.11.2006.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter is settled amicably between the parties out of the Court and he has also produced the Memorandum of Compromise, entered into between the parties on 12.08.2020 and the same was signed by concerned parties.
3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of memorandum of compromise. The memorandum of compromise shall form part and parcel of the order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
