SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
M. MERVIN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
K. PARAMASIVAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :23..07..2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P.No.954 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.4810 of 2024 M.Mervin Kumar ..... Petitioner -Versus-

1.K.Paramasivam

2.E.Sadasivam 3.Canara Bank, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, Bhavani Branch, Bhavani, Erode District.

..... Respondents Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the judgement and decree dated 24.08.2022 passed by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Erode District at Bhavani, in O.S.No.5 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.Manokaran for R2 Mr.R.Sreedhar for R3 No Appearance for R1

ORDER

Challenge has been made to the judgement and decree dated 24.08.2022 passed by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Erode District at Bhavani, whereby the suit in O.S.No.5 of 2021 was decreed in part and a decree for specific performance of the agreement of sale was granted, on the ground that the said judgement and decree were obtained by fraud and collusion.

2. The revision petitioner is a third party. The 1st respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2 and 3 are the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.5 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top