Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Arulvictoriya – Appellant
Versus
S.Gandhimani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion on appeal and court's judgment. (Para 3 , 18) |
| 2. details of property purchase and claims. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. importance of evidence and burden of proof. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
The unsuccessful plaintiff is before this Court on appeal.
2. The Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 19.12.2018, in A.S.No.31 of 2014, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivagangai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 09.11.2012, in O.S.No.189 of 2009, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the litigative status before the trial Court.
4. It is the case of the plaintiff that she had purchased 1 acre of the property on 13.05.1996 through a registered sale deed for valuable consideration. The plaintiff, pursuant to her purchase had been carrying on cultivation in the property in S.No.49/2. The plaintiff had leased out the suit property for a play ground. When the property was sub-divided, a portion of the property which was sub-divided as S.No.49/2A1C had been wrongly included and patta was gra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
