SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 61521

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
L.Muthu Karuppan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Trichy District – Respondent
W.P.(MD).No.20296 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Lenin Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian

The Court mandates timely resolution of an appeal involving property rights, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures.

Headnote:This Writ Petition under Article 226 challenges the non-consideration of an appeal against a Patta cancellation related to property cum temple administration. The Court finds that the appeal has yet to be adjudicated, thus ordering prompt consideration within twelve weeks. The decisive issue was the appeal's merit and procedural adherence in its consideration.

Table of Content
1. arguments for timely appeal consideration. (Para 2 , 3 , 5)
2. issue surrounding appeal for temple property. (Para 4)
3. court's directive for appeal processing. (Para 6)

ORDER

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by him dated 04.12.2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian, learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents.

3. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

4. According to the petitioner, the property with an extent of 0.65.0 Hectares in Old S.No.442/5 and New S.No.592/1, Puthanatham Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District belonged to Kaliamman temple administered by the petitioner's community people. The 4th respondent obtained patta in respect of the property of the temple. Therefore, the petitioner submitted an appeal before the 2nd respondent on 04.12.2024.

The said appeal has not been considered till date. Therefore, the petitioner has come before this Court.

5. The learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the appeal submitted by the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

6. In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 04.12.2024 and pass final orders on its own merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent.

7. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top