Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V. Thamilselvi, J
B. Punitha – Appellant
Versus
Manoharan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation awarded for loss due to motor vehicle accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute over notional income and its implications on compensation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's assessment of enhanced income and consortium claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final determination of compensation amounts. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion and directives regarding compensation disbursement. (Para 11 , 12) |
Respondents PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicle Act , praying to set aside the judgment and decree in MCOP No.2053 of 2016 dated 08.11.2022 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Salem For Appellants: Mr.R. Navaneetha Krishnan For Respondents: Ms.I.Malar For R2 R1 - Unclimed JUDGMENT Challenging the impugned award passed by the tribunal in MCOP.No.2053 of 2016, the appellants/petitioners have preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.
2. The appellants are wife, son and mother of deceased M.Bangaru Prasath. The case of appellants is that when the deceased was riding a truck bearing Regn. No. TN-30 AS-9346 from Tiruchengode to Chennai and the truck was repaired at Tindivanam near Mal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
