Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J
Jayanthi – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case facts including parties and nature of suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 2. growth of claims resulting in need for legal resolution. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. contrasting claims of parties regarding possession. (Para 10 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. establishment of legal precedents related to possession and title. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 5. conclusion and ruling on appeal. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 25.02.2019 in A.S.No.59 of 2017 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Chidambaram, reversing the judgment and decree dated 05.06.2017 in O.S.No.26 of 2014 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Parangipettai.
2.The plaintiff is the appellant in this regular second appeal.
3.For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.
4.The plaintiff has filed the above suit in O.S.No.26 of 2014 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Parangipettai for the following relief:
a. Pass a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents and persons claiming right under them, from, in any manner interfering with the plaintiff's pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
