IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, P. Dhanabal, JJ
Venkatesh Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Radiance Realty Developers India Ltd. – Respondent
For the Appellant : Ms.K.Subashini for M/s.Chennai Law Associates JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This civil miscellaneous second appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, [in short, “TNREAT”] in Appeal No.13 of 2025 dated 21.02.2025.
2. In fact, the order impugned dated 21.02.2025 is a common order, where, many number of appeals, that is Appeal Nos.5 to 14 of 2025 have been dealt with and a common order has been passed.
3. The appellant, along with similar persons or similar allottees who have got allotments of residential flats from the respondent Promoter, have approached the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Chennai, [in short, “TNRERA”], by filing various RCPs, which includes R.C.P.No.84 of 2023, filed by the appellant.
4. Their common grievance appears to be that they have been allotted flats and also have been allotted car parking, which according to them, forms part of the flat or an integral part of the flat. Therefore, once the cost of the flat has been fixed and the entire consideration has been paid by each of the allottees, the Promoter has no right to secure any a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.