2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 62308
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
M/s VINAYAGA CONSULTANCY – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent (GST Taxes Centre) – Respondent
Writ Petition No.27953 of 2025 | WMP.No.31341 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.M.Malarmannan
For the Respondents: Mr.R.P.Pragadish, Mr.T.Nalinidhar
The court emphasizes the necessity for compliance with GST regulations while allowing conditional restoration of registration due to genuine reasons for non-compliance.
Headnote:This writ petition concerns the challenge to an order dated 31.05.2025 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner. The petitioner argues that non-compliance was due to the impact of Covid-19 and lack of notice. The court found the reasons for non-compliance genuine. The restoration is conditional upon specific requirements, including timely filing of returns and payments as detailed in the order. The final ruling allows for restoration subject to compliance with stipulated conditions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to gst cancellation order due to covid-19. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. respondents' stance on non-filing of returns. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning for allowing restoration under conditions. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling on the writ petition. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the respondent, cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner and to quash the same and further direct the respondent to restore the petitioner's Registration vide.GSTIN-33ABMPU8129P1ZR, cancelled on 31.05.2023 by the Respondent, to enable the petitioner to pay Taxes and returns.
2. Mr.R.P.Pragadish,learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.T.Nalinidhar, learned Junior Panel Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is a registered tax payer under the GST enactments and they have been filing the GST returns regularly till December 2022, however, since the petitioner's recipients have not paid the outstanding amount to the petitioner during Covid-19 Pandemic period, the petitioner was not able to do the business and therefore could not file its monthly returns from March 2022. Consequently, the respondent issued a show cause notice on 15.01.2023, proposing the cancellation of the GST registration for non-filing of returns for a continous period of six months, and subsequently passing an order of cancellation on 31.05.2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the show cause was uploaded in the GST portal, without serving physical copy of the same to the petitioner, the petitioner was not aware of the same. Therefore, the petitioner could not file its reply, which resulted in passing of the impugned order. Further, he would submit that the limitation period for filing the appeal has been lapsed and therefore the petitioner could not file appeal. He therefore prays to set aside the impugned order and direct the respondent to restore and activate the GST registration of the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner did not file returns for the continous period of six months, which led to the passing of the impugned order. He further submitted that the revocation of the cancellation of registration will be considered only upon payment of all dues and filing of all returns.
6. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
7. Admittedly, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled due to non-compliance in filing returns. Furthermore, the limitation period for filing the appeal also got lapsed. It is stated by the petitioner that since the petitioner's recipients have not paid the outstanding amount to the petitioner during Covid-19 Pandemic period, the petitioner was not able to do the business and therefore could not file its monthly returns from March 2022. . Therefore, this Court is of the view that the reason provided by the petitioner for non-compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the stipulated time appears to be genuine.
8. In view of the above, restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the following conditions :
(i) The respondent shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the pet