SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 62453

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, Mr. N. SENTHILKUMAR, JJ
Indira – Appellant
Versus
Sathya Poondi Badrinarayanan @ Sathya Poondi – Respondent
O.S.A.No. 76 of 2025 | O.S.A.No. 77 of 2025 | C.S.No. 112 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Balasubramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan, Mr.P.T. Nalin Kumar

Joint compromise agreements between parties can be recognized by the court leading to case settlement.

Headnote:This judgment reviewed the joint memo of compromise filed by the parties, indicating the appellant's admission of the respondent's rights to the property and confirming the cancellation of the appellant's sale deed. The court notes the mutual agreements between parties for handling court fees and costs, ultimately closing the appeals in terms of the compromise. The orders state the appeals are settled with no costs attributed to either party.

Table of Content
1. closure of appeals with mutual agreement (Para 2 , 3)

COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)

A joint memo dated 30.07.2025 has been filed by the parties. The parties are also present in Court today and their presence is noted. The joint memo of compromise filed by the parties is extracted below:-

“The parties herein respectfully submits as follows:-

1.The Appellant (Defendant) admits the right, title and possession of the Respondent (Plaintiff) over the plaint schedule property.

2.The Appellant (Defendant) undertakes not to interfere with the peaceful possession & enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the Respondent (Plaintiff).

3.The appellant confirms that her sale deed dated 10.07.2015 (Ex.P.53 & Ex D.22) in respect of suit property stands cancelled and becomes unenforceable, so far as the Respondent (Plaintiff)

is concerned.

4.The Appellant (Defendant) is not pressing her counter claim filed in the suit.

5.Refund of Court fee may be ordered to the appellant by this Hon'ble Court.

6.Both parties pray for the disposal of appeals in terms of compromise.

7.Memo of compromise entered into by the parties be attached to the O.S.A. decree of this Hon'ble Court.

8.Both parties agree to bear their respective cost(s) in the appeals.”

2. Recording the aforesaid memo, these Original Side Appeals are closed as settled in terms of this order. No costs.

3. Parties are entitled to refund of Court fee and may approach the Registry for the same, accompanied by a copy of this order.

[A.S.M., J] [N.S., J]

01.08.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.

DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J.

and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

ssm O.S.A.Nos. 76 & 77 of 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top