Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s.SRM Hotels Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of lease agreement and disputes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented by the appellant. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments presented by the respondent. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's analysis of the arguments. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. final rulings and conclusions of the court. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
and
R.POORNIMA, J.
An order passed by a learned Single Judge of this court protecting the possession of the writ petitioner in respect of the leased premises, rather restoring the status quo ante by rewinding the clock, after repossession on expiry of the lease period and another order, with some adverse remarks against the Government machinery, quashing the order passed by the authority which rejected the claim of the writ petitioner for renewal of lease period, and remitting the matter to the authority for reconsideration by giving personal hearing to the writ petitioner, are put to challenge in the present writ appeals.
2. For better understanding, brief facts of the case are summarized as under:-
i) The writ petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
